Property Tax Trends for Real Estate Investors
Real estate investors who locked in properties during the early years of the pandemic were rewarded with strong appreciation and, in many cases, growing rental income.
But they weren’t immune to rising fixed costs—especially property taxes.
Rapid home price growth during the Pandemic Housing Boom pushed up assessed values in many markets. Depending on location, those tax hikes may now be eating into operating margins and cash flow.
To understand where investors are most impacted by property taxes—and where they can find the lowest rates—LendingOne analyzed the latest U.S. Census Bureau data to calculate the effective property tax rate, defined as median property taxes paid as a percentage of median home value, across hundreds of metros.
Key Findings
Rochester, NY has the highest effective property tax rate in the country at 2.45%, with other high-tax metros including Buffalo, Chicago, and Albany following, each with effective rates above 1.75%.
Midwestern and Northeastern metros dominate the top of the list, where lower home values meet higher local tax rates.
Florida metros have seen sharp increases in total tax bills, but their effective rates remain lower compared to older high-tax regions.
Effective Property Tax Rate
Among the largest 100 metros by occupied housing units, these ten had the highest effective property tax rates in 2023:
Rochester, NY: 2.45%
Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN: 1.93%
Buffalo-Cheektowaga, NY: 1.91%
Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY: 1.79%
Laredo, TX: 1.64%
Cleveland-Elyria, OH: 1.62%
Syracuse, NY: 1.56%
Scranton–Wilkes-Barre, PA: 1.55%
Toledo, OH: 1.52%
Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI: 1.50%
In markets like Rochester and Buffalo, relatively affordable home prices can be appealing to investors—but high effective tax rates mean property taxes take a disproportionately large bite out of net operating income.
Effective tax rate vs. tax bill growth: What matters for investors
It’s important to distinguish between high effective tax rates and high (or fast-rising) tax bills.
Several metros saw their effective property tax rates fall from 2019 to 2023 as home values rose faster than taxes paid. But the actual dollar outlay remains high.
Atlantic City, NJ: down from 2.87% to 1.70%
East Stroudsburg, PA: down from 2.36% to 1.44%
Keene, NH: down from 2.63% to 1.84%
Laredo, TX: down from 2.26% to 1.64%
Lebanon-Claremont, NH-VT: down from 2.16% to 1.61%
Despite the percentage drop, investors in these areas may still be paying more in absolute dollars—especially if they acquired property during the boom years. That’s because the effective tax rate is a ratio of taxes paid to property value—so if home prices surge but tax bills don’t rise at the same pace, the rate can decline while the actual amount owed increases.
For example, an investor who purchased a $250,000 home in 2020 that’s now assessed at $350,000 may face a larger tax bill, even if the effective rate has dropped from 2.2% to 1.8%.
In other words, a falling effective tax rate doesn’t always translate to real savings—it can simply reflect rising home values outpacing reassessments.
A high effective tax rate means a larger share of a property’s value is lost to taxes each year—an important metric for investors focused on cash flow yield, especially in lower-priced markets.
A high or fast-growing tax bill can put pressure on out-of-pocket operating costs, even if the rate isn’t especially high. This is more common in fast-growing Sunbelt metros, where appreciation outpaced reassessments early in the pandemic.
For investors, both can impact returns—but effective tax rate is the more stable, structural indicator of how burdensome local taxes really are.
Effective tax rates in the largest 50 U.S. metros
Florida metros are seeing rising tax burdens—but still lower rates
Florida metros like Lakeland, Tampa, and Palm Bay have posted some of the biggest five-year increases in property tax bills, reflecting sharp home price growth and new assessments. But their effective rates remain modest relative to legacy metros.
This nuance matters for investors. A market like Tampa may look affordable from a tax rate perspective, but investors entering at today’s prices should still factor in elevated tax bills as part of their underwriting.
Median annual property taxes for the largest 40 U.S. metros
The highest tax bills remain concentrated in expensive markets
While effective tax rates highlight structural tax burdens, the biggest absolute tax bills are still found in high-priced coastal metros.
New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA: $9,615
San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA: $9,553
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT: $8,840
San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley, CA: $8,380
Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown, TX: $7,066
These metros aren’t necessarily effective tax rate outliers—but high assessed values push annual property tax payments well above the national average.
Big Picture
For real estate investors, property taxes are one of the largest recurring expenses—and a key driver of deal-level cash flow.
Markets like Rochester, Chicago, and Buffalo have structurally high tax burdens relative to property value, making them especially important to underwrite carefully. Meanwhile, rising assessed values in markets like Florida are pushing up tax bills, even if the rate appears modest.
The most successful investors in today’s market are those who go beyond surface-level affordability and dig into the real, local cost of ownership—and that means paying close attention to property taxes.